Mashable: Netizens have raised serious concerns about the feasibility of this idea.

OceanGate's co-founder, Guillermo Söhnlein, has left people stunned with his ambitious vision of sending 1,000 humans to Venus by 2050. Despite the recent submersible tragedy, Söhnlein remains positive about his vision, claiming that making humanity a multi-planet species has been his lifelong dream.

However, netizens have raised serious concerns about the feasibility of this idea. Venus is infamous for its extreme conditions, with a scorching temperature of around 475°C and a toxic atmosphere filled with greenhouse gases. Many are skeptical about the practicality of creating a space station capable of withstanding such harsh effects.

In response to Söhnlein's claims that humanity could theoretically survive on Venus due to lower temperatures and less intense pressure, social media users have dubbed the project "assisted suicide." Some even humorously suggested that "Heaven's gate will be waiting" for the brave souls willing to venture to the hottest planet in the solar system.

While Söhnlein may find the idea "doable," netizens are not convinced and have expressed skepticism on social media. Critics argue that the challenges of living on Venus far outweigh the benefits, making it an impractical and risky endeavor.

As of now, specific details on how OceanGate plans to execute this ambitious project remain unclear. The company will undoubtedly face significant technical and logistical hurdles in achieving its goal of sending humans to Venus. Despite the controversy and skepticism, Söhnlein and OceanGate seem determined to pursue their interplanetary vision.

Given the recent submersible disaster, there are growing concerns about the company's capabilities and safety measures. Many netizens are questioning the feasibility and wisdom of such an ambitious venture, especially in light of the challenges already faced by space exploration.