Home > Media News >
Source: https://www.nytimes.com
After a tortuous final year at ESPN in which she went head-to-head with President Trump’s administration, Jemele Hill has found a new home.
Ms. Hill, who spent the last 12 years of her career at ESPN, is taking a jobas a staff writer at The Atlantic. She will cover sports, race, politics and culture.
Last year, Ms. Hill wrote on Twitter that Mr. Trump was a “white supremacist.” He responded by tweeting that ESPN’s ratings had “tanked” because of her. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, said Ms. Hill’s tweet was a fireable offense.
ESPN issued a statement saying that Ms. Hill’s comments did not reflect the views of the company and that she recognized they were inappropriate.
Less than a month later, Ms. Hill wrote on Twitter that people should boycott the Dallas Cowboys’ advertisers after the team’s owner, Jerry Jones, said he would bench any players who were “disrespectful to the flag.” ESPN suspended her from the network for two weeks.
She and ESPN “amicably” parted ways last month, though she said there were two years left on her contract.
Ms. Hill, it seems, took her year of controversy in stride. She spoke to The New York Times on Monday about joining The Atlantic, being a person of color in the media and getting criticized by the president.
The answers have been condensed and edited for clarity.
How did ESPN respond to your leaving?
We had a very amicable parting. I think there was a realization on both sides that this is what is best for everybody. They knew I had a desire to do things beyond sports. They understood and respected that.
Do you think you will be able to address topics at The Atlantic that you weren’t able to at ESPN?
I think one of the innate challenges that comes with being on ESPN is that it is a sports network. It is an entertainment space largely, and because of that — as should be the case — politics aren’t expected to be addressed in a meaningful way at a sports network. The Atlantic has a different mission, a different focus and a different footing.
Did you always feel you wanted to report outside of sports?
Sports has always been a great entry point for us to discuss issues that are pretty widely known in society. A lot of times sports is at the forefront, pushing us toward progress; that was always a fascinating dynamic for me. I do think this current presidency, the tone of this administration, and the fact that the president has routinely addressed sports in a way that is divisive makes it more critical and important to write about these issues.
How do you think your contentious last year at ESPN and your new position will speak to black and brown people in the media, in an industry that is still predominantly white?
I just hope that my success is in some way influencing other outlets to really be much more purposeful in promoting, advancing and recruiting people of color. When I was at The Orlando Sentinel as a sports columnist, it was embarrassing that I was the only black female sports columnist at a daily newspaper in North America. If I am able to somehow open some doors for people, that is something that I welcome and I embrace.
Do you think you’d still be at ESPN if John Skipper was still running the network?
No, I don’t. I had a very deep — I still do — respect for Skipper. He was instrumental in me being successful at ESPN, but the desire to do other things in different ways was there independent of him.
Do we need more people like Mr. Skipper to pull black and brown reporters in and groom them?
I think there has got to be an effort that is genuine. It is always framed in the way that they are giving people of color a chance. They are not giving us anything. These are opportunities that we have to earn and in many cases have had to do twice the work just to get noticed or recruited. At this point I’m tired of having to explain what the problem is. You know about N.A.B.J., N.A.H.J. and A.A.J.A. If you’re really so insistent about developing and grooming some black people, why aren’t you going to H.B.C.U.s to recruit?
Has The Atlantic asked you to tweet carefully?
No. That has not come up. There will be some flexibility there because I’m at a magazine that’s rooted in politics. I don’t have to worry about keeping politics out of my tweets.
How did it feel when President Trump mentioned you by name because of your tweets?
I was impressed that he spelled my name correctly. I actually took it as a badge of honor. Most of us in this business, we sort of live for that moment where City Hall comes after you. If you are not disrupting the people in positions of authority, it is like you are not doing your job. I was a little surprised that he had the time, given the nature of his job, to do that. It was not something that frightened me in any respect. I took it as a huge compliment.
Kanye West? That is all I could come up with at the moment. There is a lot.
It is a bad marriage when someone that ill-informed has the platform that he has. This is not about him or his politics; he has the right to support and vote for whoever he feels. The manner in which he is drawing attention to himself is not constructive. I’m not here to tell Kanye West to shut up, I’m here to tell him to read.